Review of Book The Plague by Albert Camus
By: Michael A. Arnold
It
will be one of the defining moments of the 21st
century. In 2020 the Coronavirus, COVID-19, a new strain of the SARS
virus, spread around the world in just a few months. It had been
first spotted in 2019, hence the 19 in the name COVID-19, but it was
not until the next year that the virus began to take hold. Those
first two months of 2020 were quite surreal: something was very
wrong, however much you might have tried to dismiss it, and you had
no idea what would happen next. By the 11th
of March the outbreak was declared a pandemic, and by then most of
the world had gone into lockdown.
In
most countries, only essential workers were allowed to leave their
home for work, and terms like ‘social distancing’ and
‘self isolation’, working from home, and the requirement
to wear masks when going to the became daily realities. Before
lockdown you might have dressed nice to go out with friends. Suddenly
you were getting all dressed up just to buy beans, milk and coffee.
As
Covid-19 ravaged the world, and we spent all our days working from
home and hiding from the virus, a book exploded in popularity –
mostly through Amazon: The
Plague,
or La
Peste
in the original French, a 1947 novel written by the French
philosopher Albert Camus. It is easy to see why, the novel is about a
cholera outbreak that forces an entire city quarantine and explores
how people living in that city react to the outbreak in their own
individual ways. A lot of the events in the novel, a lot of the steps
taken to contain and control the virus, and even a lot of the
attitudes in the novel will sound eerily familiar to people living
through the Covid-19 pandemic. In one part of the novel, a hospital
van is heard going to pick up an infected person, and the character
narrating comments how he barely notices the sound anymore - whereas
at the start of the outbreak the sound of ambulance horns filled them
with a sense of dread or foreboding.
Set
in Oran in French Algeria, this is a novel as much about the
characters as it is a philosophical novel or social commentary. It is
not like Nausea
by Jean Paul Sartre, one of Camus’ friends and contemporaries,
which is a exploration and explanation of Sartre’s version of
existentialist philosophy through fiction. The
Plague
is firstly a story, but one that has been informed by Camus’
version of existentialism. This does make The
Plague
more palatable to most readers than Sartre’s Nausea
is.
Existentialism,
led by people like Camus and Sartre, was extremely popular following
the end of WW2. Both men actually had the same sort of notoriety and
celebrity as a film star or someone like that, especially Camus who
was a very photogenic and attractive person. Do a Google image search
of Albert Camus and a famous picture of him smoking a cigarette will
come up, and he looks like James Dean. Never before had any
philosophy enjoyed such a wide and enthusiastic influence on the
public – and it probably will not happen like that again.
Despite
its popularity, existentialism was probably not widely understood.
Any philosophy is difficult to sum up in short, snappy sentences, and
it is not really important to go into much detail about it here. The
important thing to understand is that for Camus, life is absurd, and
any attempt to understand life is absurd, maybe even delusional –
and his branch of existentialism is often called Absurdism.
The
major part of Absurdism informing this novel is the idea life is what
the individual makes of it, or that people give their own lives
meaning in the absence of a higher Truth. This is an important theme,
because each character in the novel responds to the plague in
different ways. We have the examples of: Dr Bernard Rieux, who is
pretty stoic and diligent in trying to help and heal others during
the pandemic. He is a very practical kind of person, bravely doing
his job. From a philosophical standpoint, Rieux has his meaning to
life: helping others, and happily that is who he is. Another
character, Cottard (he is not given a last name) becomes more world
aware and friendly to others during the pandemic, but he also suffers
from violent mood swings and attacks of hopelessness and depression.
A lot of the time it seems he is unable to decide who he is and what
his life should look like. These two men have starkly contrasting
reactions to their situations, and these two are not the only
characters in the novel. The different reactions all the characters
have are very interesting when you really pay attention to them. This
is what makes this novel interesting enough to really recommend it.
The
locking off of Oran from the outside world is not exactly like the
lockdowns seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, but when reading the
novel the two things often feel the same – the texture (a mix
of uncertainly, boredom, and even a little bit of fear) is the same,
even if the exact details are not. It is easy to see why this novel
became so popular during 2020. Camus’ focus on a collection of
characters and their very different reactions to the plague are
illustrative of not just their personalities but also something about
the way wider societies react to a big crisis. Ultimately this book
circles around lessons that we owe it to ourselves to not forget.